INCORPORATING ESG CRITERIA INTO OUR INVESTMENT PROCESS
Taking the risk of a material negative outcome into account in valuing an investment
- Prior to any investment, an ESG audit is routinely conducted as part of our due diligence process, in order to identify all environmental, social or governance events or situations, which, if they came to pass, could have a significant real or potential negative impact on the value of the investment
- ESG audits and diagnoses provide an objective assessment of risks to an investment’s intrinsic value, whether environmental, social, regulatory or reputational risks. Such risks are incorporated into the investment decision. The value created by an investment is inseparable from its ESG performance.
Taking the risk of a negative outcome into account in sustainability factors
RAISE measures the medium- or long-term risk of an investment in an activity having a negative environmental, social or governance impact (i.e., non-financial risk).
In addition to ESG criteria, the main negative occurrences in sustainability are those that result in negative impacts on the seven transversal avenues for improvement that are RAISE’s core values:
- Supporting companies’ sustainable transformation in offering solutions, tools and dedicated support;
- Encouraging parity and in particular the presence of women in key governance bodies, such as boards of directors, strategic committees, and management positions;
- Encouraging the sharing of value with employees, particularly through shareholdings;
- Encouraging the measuring and controlling of carbon footprints;
- Making our companies more aware of good governance practices, particularly the importance of independent board members;
- Encouraging employee training;
- Appointing CSR reporters or hiring a CSR officer.
These avenues of improvement are measured and monitored each year under RAISE’s ESG policy.
Indicators for identifying negative occurrences in sustainability are based on RTS the Regulatory Technical Standards (TRS) of the SFDR regulation) standards are monitored regularly and are monitored regularly and subject to dedicated reports.
Taking the risk of a negative outcome into account in sustainability factors
RAISE measures the medium- or long-term risk of an investment in an activity having a negative environmental, social or governance impact (i.e., non-financial risk).
In addition to ESG criteria, the main negative occurrences in sustainability are those that result in negative impacts on the seven transversal avenues for improvement that are RAISE’s core values:
- Supporting companies’ sustainable transformation in offering solutions, tools and dedicated support;
- Encouraging parity and in particular the presence of women in key governance bodies, such as boards of directors, strategic committees, and management positions;
- Encouraging the sharing of value with employees, particularly through shareholdings;
- Encouraging the measuring and controlling of carbon footprints;
- Making our companies more aware of good governance practices, particularly the importance of independent board members;
- Encouraging employee training;
- Appointing CSR reporters or hiring a CSR officer.
These avenues of improvement are measured and monitored each year under RAISE’s ESG policy.
Indicators for identifying negative occurrences in sustainability are based on RTS the Regulatory Technical Standards (TRS) of the SFDR regulation) standards are monitored regularly and are monitored regularly and subject to dedicated reports.
Environmental indicators
Greenhouse gas emissions (perimeters 1, 2, 3)
Carbon footprint
Carbon intensity of portfolio issuers
Exposure to fossil fuel sector
Share of consumption and production of non-renewable energies
Water pollution
Share of investments in activities having a negative impact on biodiversity
Intensity of energy consumption by high-emission sectors
Hazardous waste
Social indicators
Share of issuers implicated in a violation of the UN’s Global Compact principles the OECD’s guiding principles
Share of issuers implicated in insufficient processes and mechanisms for monitoring based on the UN’s Global Compact principles the OECD’s guiding principles
Share of investments linked to controversial weapons (antipersonnel mines, cluster weapons, and chemical and biological weapons)
Diversity on boards of directors (gender ratio)
Non-adjusted gender gap in compensation
ENHANCING OUR HOLDINGS EXTRA-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCES
We go beyond measurements and express our commitment in a constant drive for progress throughout the lifecycle of our portfolio companies by guiding them towards a trajectory of tangible improvement.
Convinced of the importance of ESG challenges and the monitoring of those challenges, we support managers in setting up their own ESG policies through the following mechanisms:
- Training and awareness campaigns;
- Recommendations of specific areas for improvement;
- Co-design of an ESG roadmap;
- Monitoring of their progress through our reporting tools.
By way of illustration, last year alone, RAISE issued 159 priority areas of improvement with its 31 portfolio companies. Its 2020 report reported encouraging results, with 19% reported as completed and 34% in the process of being complied, hence a total of 53% of the priority areas of improvement.
CONSOLIDATING AND DEEPENING THE ESG STRATEGY WITHIN RAISE
As an asset management firm, we measure and track the extra-financial performance of RAISE Conseil to lay out a trajectory for improvement for ourselves, just as we do for our portfolio companies.
Each year, RAISE conducts an assessment of the carbon footprint of its activity (including Scopes 1, 2 and 3), along with an ESG diagnosis that highlights areas of improvements.
As an extension of this approach, RAISE adheres to the same rules as its portfolio companies in filling out the 130-KPI grid annually.